Neuroquantology 3:334-364 (2003)

I argue that our sensory fields are photon fields. The philosophical foundation here is informed by mind/brain identity theory, such as we find in Russell, Feigl, Lockwood and Chalmers. In brief, given Dyson's observation that all material things consist of quantum fields, and given an identity of mind and brain, our sensory fields are then most plausibly photon fields.
Keywords vision  quantum  field  identity  mind  brain
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Opticks.Isaac Newton - 1704 - Dover Press.
Sensory Qualities.Austen Clark - 1993 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Definissabilite Dans Les Corps de Fonctions P-Adiques.Luc Bélair & Jean-Louis Duret - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):783-785.
Notes on the Stability of Separably Closed Fields.Carol Wood - 1979 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (3):412-416.
What Are Quanta, and Why Does It Matter?Nick Huggett - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:69 - 76.
Problem-Solving, Research Traditions, and the Development of Scientific Fields.Henry Frankel - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:29 - 40.


Added to PP index

Total views
228 ( #50,136 of 2,519,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #36,261 of 2,519,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes