Equality Does Not Entail Equality across Species

Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I critique Peter Singer’s view that equality across species is a natural extension of equality. Singer presents one minor and two major arguments. The first major argument is that equality across species is implied by the traditional principle of equality. The second is that it follows from a conception that is behind the principle of equality, namely the moral “point of view of the universe.” The minor argument is a theory of the altruistic character and expanding circles of ethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Equality does not entail equality across species.Roger Fjellstrom - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
Species Equality and the Foundations of Moral Theory.James C. Anderson - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):347 - 365.
Reassessing Egalitarianism.Jeremy Moss - 2014 - Palgrave McMillan.
How to Value Equality.Jeremy Moss - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):187-196.
Forget about equality.Madison Powers - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (2):129-144.
Justice is not equality.Richard J. Arneson - 2008 - Ratio 21 (4):371-391.
On the Scope and Grounds of Social equality.Rekha Nath - 2015 - In Fabian Schuppert and Ivo Wallimann-Helmer Edited by Carina Fourie (ed.), Social Equality: Essays on What It Means to be Equals. Oxford University Press. pp. 186-208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Specifying Speciesism.Roger Fjellstrom - 2002 - Environmental Values 11 (1):63-74.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references