Questions concerning attention and Stiegler’s therapeutics

Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (4):348-360 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article sets out to develop the concept of attention as a key aspect to building the possible therapeutics that Bernard Stiegler’s recent works have pointed to (The Automatic Society, 2016, The Neganthropocene, 2018 and Qu’appelle-t-on Panser, 2018). The therapeutic aspect of pharmacology takes place through processes that are neganthropic; therefore, which attempt to counteract the entropic nature of digital technologies where there is flattening out to the measurable and the calculable of Big Data. The most obvious examples of this flattening out can be seen in relation to the use of natural language processing technologies for text interpretation and the use of text analytics alongside student analytics. However, the process of exosomatisation of knowledge takes place in forms of hypomnesic tertiary retentions or digital technologies. The loss of knowledge is inherent to these processes of exteriorisation, this loss of knowledge takes place through a process proletarianisation which Marx had pointed to in the Grundisse (1939). The therapeutic gesture is, therefore, an intrinsically educational one, where the loss of knowledge of the pharmacological nature of digital technologies is counteracted by other forms of knowledge construction that can be enabled by digital technologies. Hence, there is a profound educational gesture necessary to enable the re-harnessing of technology to enable the therapeutics. This paper will argue that the positive re-harnessing, the therapeutics, can take place through the development of new forms of neganthropic gestures which can be afforded by the development of specific forms of digital technologies. These also enable a contributive research process whereby the rationalisation of the production of knowledge within the university can be challenged by collaborative, interpretative processes of knowledge production.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Politics of digital learning—Thinking education with Bernard Stiegler.Susanna Lindberg - 2020 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (4):384-396.
Taking Care of Youth and the Generations.Bernard Stiegler - 2010 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Stiegler Contra Robinson: On the hyper-solicitation of youth.Joff P. N. Bradley - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (10):1023-1038.
Artwork as Technics.Mark Jackson - 2016 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 48 (13).
Ideology and Post-structuralism after Bernard Stiegler.Ben Turner - 2016 - Journal of Political Ideologies 22 (1):92-110.
De L’Industrialisation Du Mal-Être À La Renaissance Du Politique. Un Entretien Avec Bernard Stiegler.Bernard Stiegler - 2010 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 14 (2):78-108.
The university of the future: Stiegler after Derrida.Constance L. Mui & Julien S. Murphy - 2020 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (4):455-465.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-12

Downloads
14 (#925,441)

6 months
6 (#403,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Technics and time.Bernard Stiegler - 1998 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Introduction to phenomenology.Dermot Moran - 2000 - New York: Routledge.
Introduction to Phenomenology.Dermot Moran - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (4):772-773.
Technics and time, 3: cinematic time and the question of malaise.Bernard Stiegler - 2010 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Stephen Francis Barker.
Technics and Time, 2: Disorientation.Bernard Stiegler - 1998 - Stanford University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references