Names and the 'de re — de dicto' distinction

Philosophical Studies 39 (1):25 - 34 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00354810

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Stich againstde dicto‐de reambiguity.Dale Jacquette - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):223-230.
Frege’s Distinction Between Sense and Reference.Gideon Makin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):147-163.
Prototypes, belief ascriptions, and ambiguity.Henry Jackman - unknown
Singular Propositions, Abstract Constituents, and Propositional Attitudes.Edward N. Zalta - 1989 - In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 455--78.
The "De Dicto/De Re" Distinction in Relation to Actions.Martin Bell - 1983 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83:159 - 173.
Are desires de dicto fetishistic?Jonas Olson - 2002 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):89 – 96.
Names and the de re/de dicto distinction.James D. Carney - 1983 - Philosophia 12 (3-4):357-361.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
95 (#177,295)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Thoughts and their ascription.Michael Devitt - 1984 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9 (1):385-420.
The Epistemological Argument Against Descriptivism.Robin Jeshion - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):325-345.
Essentialist arguments against descriptivism.Michael Mcglone - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4):443-462.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references