Avoiding anthropocentrism in evolutionarily inclusive ethics

Animal Sentience 5 (29) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mikhalevich & Powell are to be commended for challenging the “invertebrate dogma” that invertebrates are unworthy of ethical concern. However, developing an evolutionarily inclusive ethics requires facing some of the more radical implications of rejecting hierarchical scala naturae and human-centered conceptions of the biological world. In particular, we need to question the anthropocentric assumptions that still linger in discussions like these.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sheep complexity outside the laboratory.C. E. Abbate - 2019 - Animal Sentience 233:1-3.
Animal Ethics and Philosophy: Questioning the Orthodoxy.Elisa Aaltola & John Hadley (eds.) - 2014 - New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Animal rights: Autonomy and redundancy. [REVIEW]David Sztybel - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.
Ethics of animal use. [REVIEW]Gregory S. McElwain - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (3):291-293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-20

Downloads
242 (#80,744)

6 months
71 (#61,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Fitzpatrick
John Carroll University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations