Questions for a Science of Moral Responsibility

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (2):381-394 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In the last few decades, the literature on moral responsibility has been increasingly populated by scientific studies. Studies in neuroscience and psychology, in particular, have been claimed to be relevant for discussions about moral responsibility in a number of ways. And at the same time, there is not yet a systematic understanding of the sort of questions a science of moral responsibility is supposed to answer. This paper is an attempt to move toward such an understanding. I discuss three models for framing scientific questions relevant to an investigation of moral responsibility. The favored model—the Enhancement model—proposes that a science of moral responsibility has two descriptive tasks. First, science can describe the causes and effects of the many sorts of responses that constitute the human practices of moral responsibility, such as praise, blame, and punishment. And, second, science can describe how modifications aiming at the improvement of such practices can be achieved. Relatively to the other models to be considered, the Enhancement model is broader in scope and less tied to the traditional philosophical agenda on moral responsibility.

Similar books and articles

Moral responsibility.Elinor Mason - 2005 - Philosophical Books 46 (4):343-353.
Responsibility as Answerability.Angela M. Smith - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (2):99-126.
Recent Work on Moral Responsibility.Elinor Mason - 2005 - Philosophical Books 46 (4):343-353.
Is Neuroscience Relevant to Our Moral Responsibility Practices?Joseph Vukov - 2014 - Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 2 (2):61-82.
Moral Responsibility.Christopher Cowley - 2013 - Bristol, CT: Routledge.
Technological delegation: Responsibility for the unintended.Katinka Waelbers - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):51-68.
On Derivative Moral Responsibility and the Epistemic Connection Required for Moral Responsibility.William Simkulet - 2015 - Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):61-75.


Added to PP

196 (#66,143)

6 months
46 (#29,757)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcelo Fischborn
Instituto Federal Farroupilha

Citations of this work

Gilberto Gomes é mesmo um compatibilista?Marcelo Fischborn - 2018 - Filosofia Unisinos 19 (3):179-188.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Illusion of Conscious Will.Daniel M. Wegner - 2002 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

View all 65 references / Add more references