Pragmatical Paradox of Signature

Signata 9 (1):485-504 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper proposes to grasp handwritten signature as a metaphysical invention of the so-called “Western” civilization, where the signature is supposed to make possible juridical identification of the person who wrote it. However, despite this expectation of reliability, the Western handwritten signature is an aporetic sign, which is considered to be authentic (unrepeatable) and conventional (repeatable) at the same time. Because the signature is a sign of juridical identification and its authenticity can always be forged, Jacques Derrida tries to deconstruct the contradictory functioning of Western metaphysics, which leads to confusion in our expectations of authenticity and identity in our uses of signatures. By proposing a new reading of Derridean texts concerning writing, the paper focuses on the pragmatical paradox that grounds our contradictory legal politics of signing: because the exact manual reproduction of a line is impossible, no one can satisfy the legislative obligation to sign conformably to the model signature. That’s the aporia of trace’s recognition, which establishes the signature as a sign: on the one hand, the signature is supposed to represent the juridical identity of the person who traced it; on the other hand, the signature, which constantly changes its graphical form, makes every certain identification impossible. In order to question the juridical identity traditionally guaranteed by the signature, this paper invites to grasp the legal practice of signing as a subversive performativity, which is produced during the passage between recognition of juridical identity requested by the law and its simultaneous and inevitable transgression. Finally, the paper proposes a new approach to the signature as a visual performance of the self, based on a reevaluation of the altercation between Jacques Derrida and John Searle concerning the iterative character of traces and performatives.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The unlimited responsibility of spilling ink.Marko Zlomislic - 2007 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 11 (1).
Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language.Maureen Chun & Timothy Attanucci (eds.) - 2014 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Issues: The Promise of a Speech Act.Michael Naas - 2020 - Research in Phenomenology 50 (3):333-350.
Limited Inc.Jacques Derrida - 1988 - Northwestern University Press.
Signature Derrida.Jacques Derrida, Jay Williams & Françoise Meltzer (eds.) - 2013 - London: University of Chicago Press.
‘Signature Event Context’ … in, well, context.Joshua Kates - 2018 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 12 (1):117-141.
Double Signature.Mairéad Hanrahan - 2016 - Paragraph 39 (2):165-186.
Limited Inc.Gerald Graff, Jeffrey Mehlman & Samuel Weber (eds.) - 1977 - Northwestern University Press.
Jacques Derrida.Jackn D. Reynolds - 2002 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-22

Downloads
160 (#110,651)

6 months
46 (#77,970)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michaela Fiserova
Metropolitan University Prague

References found in this work

How to do things with words.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
Glas.Jacques Derrida - 1974 - Paris (9, rue Linné, 75005): Éditions Galilée.
Expression and Meaning.John Searle - 1982 - Philosophical Quarterly 32 (127):177-180.
John Searle: From speech acts to social reality.Barry Smith - 2003 - In John Searle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-33.

View all 7 references / Add more references