- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Majority efficiencies for simple voting procedures: Summary and interpretation [Book Review]
Theory and Decision 14 (2):141-153 (1982)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Axiomatizing collective judgment sets in a minimal logical language.Marc Pauly - 2007 - Synthese 158 (2):233-250.
Voting Procedures for Complex Collective Decisions. An Epistemic Perspective.Luc Bovens & Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2004 - Ratio Juris 17 (2):241-258.
The Epistemic Edge of Majority Voting Over Lottery Voting.Yann Allard-Tremblay - 2012 - Res Publica 18 (3):207-223.
Condorcet vs. Borda in light of a dual majoritarian approach.Eyal Baharad & Shmuel Nitzan - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (2):151-162.
Voting power implications of a unified European representation at the IMF.Dennis Leech & Robert Leech - unknown
A simple proof of Sen's possibility theorem on majority decisions.Christian Elsholtz & Christian List - 2005 - Elemente der Mathematik 60:45-56.
Suitable properties for any electronic voting system.Jean-Luc Koning & Didier Dubois - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (4):251-260.
Majority voting on restricted domains.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2010 - Journal of Economic Theory 145 (2):512-543.
Instability and Convergence Under Simple-Majority Rule: Results from Simulation of Committee Choice in Two-Dimensional Space. [REVIEW]David H. Koehler - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (4):305-332.
How difficult should it be to amend constitutional laws?Kristian Skagen Ekeli - 2007 - Scandinavian Studies in Law 52:79-101.
Review of paradoxes afflicting various voting procedures where one out of m candidates (m ≥ 2) must be elected. [REVIEW]Dan S. Felsenthal - unknown
On the significance of the absolute Margin.Christian List - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (3):521-544.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-01-04
Downloads
60 (#262,991)
6 months
7 (#418,426)
2013-01-04
Downloads
60 (#262,991)
6 months
7 (#418,426)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Discrepancies in the outcomes resulting from different voting schemes.Hannu Nurmi - 1988 - Theory and Decision 25 (2):193-208.
Microcosms and macrocosms: Seat allocation in proportional representation systems.Amnon Rapoport, Dan S. Felsenthal & Zeev Maoz - 1988 - Theory and Decision 24 (1):11-33.
The expected likelihood of transitivity: A survey.William V. Gehrlein - 1994 - Theory and Decision 37 (2):175-209.
Peter C. Fishburn.Fred S. Roberts, William V. Gehrlein & Steven J. Brams - 2021 - Theory and Decision 93 (1):1-6.
Dimensions of election procedures: Analyses and comparisons.Peter C. Fishburn - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (4):371-397.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo