Is language necessary for thinking about thoughts

Dissertation, University of Edinburgh (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper considers one aspect of the relationship between language and thought, focusing on a theory proposed by José Luis Bermúdez. Bermúdez argues that language is required for any kinds of thinking that involve thinking about thoughts, or what he calls 'intentional ascent'. I argue, to the contrary, that Bermúdez gives us no reason to suppose language is necessary for all instances of thinking about thoughts. Whilst I am broadly sympathetic to supra-communicative approaches to language, I seek to deny Bermúdez’s particular thesis; I do so by showing that alternative representational formats, specifically maps, could play qualitatively the same role that language is supposed to play in his account of thinking about thoughts.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,952

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

53 (#228,469)

6 months
3 (#247,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah A Fisher
University College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references