Fair Innings? Against Healthcare Rationing in Favour of the Young over the Elderly

Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (4):431-450 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article provides a critical appraisal of the case for healthcare being rationed away from older patients to those who are younger. After sketching a metaphysics of elderliness and reviewing clinical and economic cases for healthcare rationing, the article looks in depth at the most challenging case for age rationing known as the ‘fair innings’ case. This article rejects that case and makes an alternative case that fairness actually dictates against age rationing in favour of allocation on the basis of need. It concludes with a call for a renewed ‘covenant between generations’, founded on the virtue of pietas

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The fair innings argument and increasing life spans.A. Farrant - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (1):53-56.
Must We Ration Health Care for the Elderly?Daniel Callahan - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):10-16.
Rationing: the loss of a concept.H. Upton - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):406-409.
Justice, health, and healthcare.Norman Daniels - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):2 – 16.
Age-weighting.Greg Bognar - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (2):167-189.
Healthcare regulation as a tool for public accountability.Rui Nunes, Guilhermina Rego & Cristina Brandão - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3):257-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
100 (#169,877)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references