Episteme 15 (2):154-165 (2018)

Bob Fischer
Texas State University
Realists about modality offer an attractive semantics for modal discourse in terms of possible worlds, but standard accounts of the worlds—as properties, propositions, or causally-isolated concreta—invoke entities with which we can’t interact. If realism is true, how can we know anything about modal matters? Let's call this "the Benacerraf Problem." I suggest that C. I. Lewis has an intriguing answer to it. Given that we’re willing to disentangle some of Lewis’s insights from his phenomenalism, we can take the following line. If the Benacerraf Problem is a genuine one, then it threatens all knowledge—not just modal knowledge. But then it leads to a general and implausible form of skepticism, not a limited and more plausible debunking argument. Hence, whatever we’re willing to say about skepticism we should say about the Benacerraf Problem.
Keywords Benacerraf  modal epistemology  integration challenge
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/epi.2016.52
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mathematical Truth.Paul Benacerraf - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.
Entitlement and Rationality.C. S. Jenkins - 2007 - Synthese 157 (1):25-45.
Self-Knowing Agents.Lucy O’Brien - 2009 - Analysis 69 (1):187-188.
An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation.Paul Henle - 1948 - Journal of Philosophy 45 (19):524-532.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Epistemology of Modality.Antonella Mallozzi, Michael Wallner & Anand Vaidya - 2021 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

To Bridge Gödel’s Gap.Eileen Nutting - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2133-2150.
Uma Solução para o Problema de Benacerraf.Eduardo Castro - 2009 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (1):7-28.
Understanding and Essence.Anand Jayprakash Vaidya - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (4):811-833.
A Platonist Epistemology.Mark Balaguer - 1995 - Synthese 103 (3):303 - 325.
Applied Mathematics in the Sciences.Dale Jacquette - 2012 - In Majda Trobok Nenad Miščević & Berislav Žarnić (eds.), Croatian Journal of Philosophy. Springer. pp. 29--57.
Benacerraf’s Revenge.Ben Caplan & Chris Tillman - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (S1):111-129.
Propositions, Structure and Representation.Thomas Hodgson - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (3pt3):339-349.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #267,610 of 2,498,786 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #279,813 of 2,498,786 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes