The Journal of Ethics 18 (1):19-21 (2014)

John Fischer
University of California, Riverside
Here we respond to Johansson’s main worry, as laid out in his, “Actual and Counterfactual Attitudes: Reply to Fischer and Brueckner.” We show how our principle BF*(dd*) can be adjusted to address this concern compatibly with our fundamental approach to responding to Lucretius
Keywords Asymmetry in attitudes  Deprivation thesis  Jens Johansson  Lucretius  Prenatal and posthumous non-existence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10892-013-9157-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How A-Theoretic Deprivationists Should Respond to Lucretius.Natalja Deng - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (3):417-432.
More on the Mirror: Reply to Fischer and Brueckner.Jens Johansson - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (4):341-351.
Torture and Incoherence: A Reply to Cyr.Duncan Purves - 2015 - The Journal of Ethics 19 (2):213-218.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
48 ( #236,052 of 2,507,109 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,109 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes