Accommodating Counterfactual Attitudes: A Further Reply to Johansson

The Journal of Ethics 18 (1):19-21 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Here we respond to Johansson’s main worry, as laid out in his, “Actual and Counterfactual Attitudes: Reply to Fischer and Brueckner.” We show how our principle BF*(dd*) can be adjusted to address this concern compatibly with our fundamental approach to responding to Lucretius

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,336

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-25

Downloads
53 (#254,725)

6 months
3 (#338,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Fischer
University of California, Riverside

Citations of this work

How A-theoretic deprivationists should respond to Lucretius.Natalja Deng - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (3):417-432.
More on the Mirror: Reply to Fischer and Brueckner.Jens Johansson - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (4):341-351.
Torture and Incoherence: A Reply to Cyr.Duncan Purves - 2015 - The Journal of Ethics 19 (2):213-218.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references