- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
In Defense of Kant's Religion
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (3):167-171 (2009)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
In Defense of Kant's Religion.Chris L. Firestone & Nathan A. Jacobs - 2008 - Indiana University Press.
A Reply to Critics of In Defense of Kant’s Religion.George di Giovanni - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):210-228.
Chris L. Firestone, Nathan Jacobs, In Defense of Kant’s Religion (Indiana Series in Philosophy of Religion): Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, 2008, xvi and 280 pp, $24.95. [REVIEW]Robert Gressis - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (3):167-171.
Chris L. Firestone, Nathan Jacobs, In Defense of Kant’s Religion : Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, 2008, xvi and 280 pp, $24.95. [REVIEW]Robert Gressis - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (3):167-171.
In Defense of Not Defending Kant’s Religion.Gordon E. Michalson - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):181-192.
In Defense of Not Defending Kant’s Religion.Gordon E. Michalson Jr - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):181-192.
A Reply to Critics of In Defense of Kant’s Religion.Chris L. Firestone - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):210-228.
Kant on the Christian Religion.Chris L. Firestone & Nathan Jacobs - 2007 - Philosophia Christi 9 (1):63-72.
A Reply to Critics of In Defense of Kant’s Religion.Nathan A. Jacobs - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):210-228.
Kants religionsschrift door de Bril Van twee hedendaagse theologen: Bedenkingen bij in defense of Kant's religion Van Firestone en Jacobs.Geert van Eekert - 2011 - Bijdragen 72 (4):382-407.
In Defence of Kant's “Religion”– By Chris L. Firestone and Nathan Jacobs.Daniel Plant - 2010 - Modern Theology 26 (2):303-305.
Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion.Chris L. Firestone & Stephen R. Palmquist (eds.) - 2006 - Indiana University Press.
Cross-Examination of In Defense of Kant’s Religion.Stephen R. Palmquist - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):170-180.
Kant's Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: an Interpretation and Defense.Lawrence Pasternack - 2014 - New York: Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-22
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2017-02-22
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
How a Kantian Ideal Can Be Practical.Alexander T. Englert - 2022 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65.
On the Alleged Augustinianism in Kant’s Religion.Lawrence Pasternack - 2020 - Kantian Review 25 (1):103-124.
The ‘Two Experiments’ of Kant’s Religion: Dismantling the Conundrum.Lawrence Pasternack - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (1):107-131.
Kant's Quasi‐Transcendental Argument for a Necessary and Universal Evil Propensity in Human Nature.Stephen R. Palmquist - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):261-297.
Original Sin and Radical Evil: Kierkegaard and Kant.Roe Fremstedal - 2012 - Kantian Review 17 (2):197-225.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo