Financial Statement Frauds and Auditor Sanctions: An Analysis of Enforcement Actions in China

Journal of Business Ethics 62 (4):367-381 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The rising tide of corporate scandals and audit failures has shocked the public, and the integrity of auditors is being increasingly questioned. It is crucial for auditors and regulators to understand the main causes of audit failure and devise preventive measures accordingly. This study analyzes enforcement actions issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission against auditors in respect of fraudulent financial reporting committed by listed companies in China. We find that auditors are more likely to be sanctioned by the regulators for failing to detect and report material misstatement frauds rather than disclosure frauds. Further analysis of the material misstatements indicates that auditors are more likely to be sanctioned for failing to detect and report revenue-related frauds rather than assets-related frauds. In sum, our results suggest that regulators believe auditors have the responsibility to detect and report frauds that are egregious, transaction-based, and related to accounting earnings. The results contribute to our knowledge of auditors’ responsibilities for detecting frauds as perceived by regulators.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Enhancing perceptions of auditor independence.Michael A. Pearson - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):53 - 56.
The Effect of Guanxi on Audit Quality in China.Jihong Liu, Yaping Wang & Liansheng Wu - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (4):621-638.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#196,943)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?