The Unintended Consequences of Chile’s Neurorights Constitutional Reform: Moving beyond Negative Rights to Capabilities

Neuroethics 15 (3):1-11 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As scholars envision a new regulatory or statutory neurorights schema it is important to imagine unintended consequences if reforms are implemented before their implications are fully understood. This paper critically evaluates provisions proposed for a new Chilean Constitution and evaluates this movement against efforts to improve the diagnosis of, and treatment for, individuals with disorders of consciousness within the broader context of disability law, international human rights, and a capabilities approach to health justice as advanced by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Framed in this way, any neurorights regime would need to satisfy several criteria. First it would be obliged to balance both positive and negative rights in the furtherance of human capabilities. Second, it would need to be future oriented and informed about the science it sought to regulate and not fall prey to science fiction fantasies that remain ungrounded in reality. Third, it would need to be specific and avoid generalizations that would lead to conceptual confusion and litigation that could delay scientific progress. Finally, it would need to harmonize novel neurorights with long-established norms in international disability and human rights law. A failure to meet these criteria will destine any novel neurorights regime to the periphery. At this juncture Chile’s nascent constitutional venture into neurorights fails to satisfy these criteria. While there yet may be a role for a more capacious and bivalent articulation of neurorights that account for capabilities and precedent, the current Chilean neurorights reforms are vague and premature. As such they should undergo additional scholarly scrutiny and should not be adopted by other jurisdictions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Constitutional Thinking To The State-owned Property Rights Reform.Guang-hua Zhu & Xu-Dong Chen - 2005 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:102-107.
A Non-positivistic Concept of Constitutional Rights.Robert Alexy - 2020 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 33 (1):35-46.
A Theory of Constitutional Rights.Robert Alexy - 2002 - Oxford University Press UK.
On Surprises, Stigma, Sports, Sprouts.Inez de Beaufort - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (3):362-363.
In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication.Charles-Maxime Panaccio - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (1):109-128.
Liberalism and the constitution.Sotirios A. Barber - 2007 - Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):234-265.
A Theory of Constitutional Rights.Julian Rivers (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-24

Downloads
35 (#396,067)

6 months
12 (#122,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Fins
Cornell University