Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in a South African University: A Q-Methodology Approach

Ethics and Behavior 28 (4):284-301 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The prevalence of academic dishonesty is a matter of considerable concern for institutions of higher education everywhere. We explored students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty using Q methodology, which provides insights that are different from those obtained through surveys or interviews. South African students ranked 48 statements, giving reasons why students cheat, on an 11-column grid, anchored by strongly agree and strongly disagree. Q factor analysis was used to identify groups of individuals who share the same perspective. The three perspectives that emerged viewed academic dishonesty as moral transgressions, pressure transgressions, or confused transgressions. These suggest different approaches to addressing the issue.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Academic Dishonesty.Akakandelwa Akakandelwa, Priti Jain & Sitali Wamundila - 2013 - Journal of Information Ethics 22 (2):141-154.


Added to PP

101 (#127,776)

6 months
2 (#324,601)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?