Education for patients with limb loss or absence: Aging, overuse concerns, and patient treatment knowledge gaps

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The goals of vascular composite allotransplantation for hand are to maximize functional status and psychosocial wellbeing and to improve quality of life. Candidates are carefully vetted by transplant programs through an extensive evaluation process to exclude those patients with contraindications and to select those that are most likely to attain functional or quality of life benefit from transplant. Patient choice for any treatment, however, requires that candidates be able to understand the risks, benefits, and alternatives before choosing to proceed. This study aimed to understand patients’ knowledge and perceptions about treatment options for hand loss, including hand transplant. This study will be used to inform a standardized education approach and develop conversation aids for use by clinicians and patients throughout the treatment decision process. Ten individuals who had experienced hand amputation or had congenital limb loss were interviewed to better understand previous and current decisions about treatment, experiences in adjusting to their treatment, and perceptions about hand VCA. From this qualitative interview data, four findings emerged: knowledge and education around VCA as a treatment option; adaptation of individuals with limb loss; fear of risk associated with transplantation; issues of aging and overuse injuries to existing limbs. Results suggests that there is opportunity for expanding education about all treatment options for patients with new loss, long-term loss, and congenital limb loss. Establishing a baseline of knowledge about all options–prosthetics, rehabilitative strategies, and VCA—can help patients evaluate their values and goals of treatment. Issues associated with aging, including overuse and injury, and adaptability over the life course should be included in considerations about treatment choices. Data indicate the need for routinely assessing patient preferences about treatment choice so patients can plan for their future as they adapt and age and as technology for treatments change. To assure that thorough information is provided for current and future decision-making, education about treatment choices and selection procedures for VCA should be standardized.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Healthy limb amputation, bioethics and patient autonomy.Kellie Williamson - 2010 - Emergent Australasian Philosophers 3 (1).
An economic theory of patient decision-making.Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):153-164.
When Is Patient Education Unethical?Barbara K. Redman - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (6):813-820.
Law, Ethics, and the Patient Preference Predictor.R. Dresser - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):178-186.
Grief, Phantoms, and Re-membering Loss.Catherine Fullarton - 2020 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 34 (3):284-296.
The Ethical Issues of Terminal Cancer Patients.Wenhao Su - 2006 - Philosophy and Culture 33 (4):5-15.
Treatment Adherence in the Absence of Insight: A Puzzle and a Proposed Solution.Marga Reimer - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (1):65-75.
Ethical complexities in assessing patients’ insight.Laura Guidry-Grimes - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (3):178-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-02

Downloads
8 (#1,243,760)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references