A Symposium on Nazi Law

Jurisprudence 3 (2):341-463 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is beyond doubt that the legal system established by the Nazi government in Germany between 1933-1945 represented a gross departure from the rule of law: the Nazis eradicated legal security and certainty; allowed for judicial and state arbitrariness; blocked epistemic access to what the law requires; issued unpredictable legal requirements; and so on. This introduction outlines the distorted nature of the Nazi legal system and looks at the main factors that contributed to this grave divergence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-23

Downloads
1,722 (#8,169)

6 months
183 (#17,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Herlinde Pauer-Studer
University of Vienna
Julian Fink
Universität Bayreuth

Citations of this work

The Distorted Jurisprudential Discourse of Nazi Law: Uncovering the ‘Rupture Thesis’ in the Anglo-American Legal Academy.Simon Lavis - 2018 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 31 (4):745-770.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law (1946).Radbruch Gustav - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (1):1-11.
Distortions of Normativity.Herlinde Pauer-Studer & J. David Velleman - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):329-356.
Reply: The Nature and Virtue of Law.N. E. Simmonds - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (2):277-293.

Add more references