American Journal of Bioethics 16 (3):15-24 (2016)

Authors
Stuart Youngner
Case Western Reserve University
Joseph Fins
Cornell University
Martin Smith
University of Liverpool
Abstract
Although clinical ethics consultation is a high-stakes endeavor with an increasing prominence in health care systems, progress in developing standards for quality is challenging. In this article, we describe the results of a pilot project utilizing portfolios as an evaluation tool. We found that this approach is feasible and resulted in a reasonably wide distribution of scores among the 23 submitted portfolios that we evaluated. We discuss limitations and implications of these results, and suggest that this is a significant step on the pathway to an eventual certification process for clinical ethics consultants
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2015.1134705
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Core Competencies for Healthcare Ethics Consultation. [REVIEW]Jenny Heyl - 2018 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 18 (1):193-194.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Quality Is Addressed So Rarely in Clinical Ethics Consultation.George J. Agich - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (4):339.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-27

Total views
40 ( #283,584 of 2,506,442 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,812 of 2,506,442 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes