On the Nature of the Platonic Erôs: Daimôn or Theos?

Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 28:157-189 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although in the Symposium Plato describes Erôs as a daimôn-metaxy, i.e. as an intermediate and intermediary divinity between gods and men, in the Phaedrus it is said that Erôs is a theos —a god. I will try to show that these different descriptions do not imply a substantial change of mind but work as two complementary views about the true nature of Erôs. According to the Phaedrus, although erôs can remain just at a physical level and not develop its divine power, it is also possible that, thanks to the same intense, sexual desire for the beautiful boy, the lover recollects the Form of beauty and so grows divine Erôs`s wings. However, only the gods never lose their wings and so are in regular, full contact with the Forms. The human souls need to acquire the wings and even so take the risk of losing them; they are then in an intermediate state —metaxy— like Erôs in the Symposium.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Eros Tyrannos: Alcibiades as the Model of the Tyrant in Book IX of the Republic.Annie Larivée - 2012 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6 (1):1-26.
Eros, psyche and mania: The sources of philosophical inspiration according to Plato.M. Carlos Pajaro - 2009 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 9:134-164.
Eros in Plato’s Timaeus.Jill Gordon - 2005 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):255-278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-12

Downloads
9 (#1,181,695)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references