Implementing Selective Conscientious Objection: Some Guiding Principles

In Dr David Whetham, Professor Paul Robinson & Dr Andrea Ellner (eds.), When Soldiers Say No: Selective Conscientious Objection in the Modern Military. Ashgate (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Assume that military professionals should have the right to exercise selective conscientious objection (SCO). Implementing policies and programs to facilitate the right to SCO would be tricky. This essay offers suggestions for how to proceed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Objecting morally.C. A. J. Coady - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (4):375-397.
Sincerity, accuracy and selective conscientious objection.Mark Navin - 2013 - Journal of Military Ethics 12 (2):111 - 128.
When should conscientious objection be accepted.Morten Magelssen - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (1):18-21.
Why Liberal States Must Accommodate Tax Resistors.Jason Brennan - forthcoming - Public Affairs Quarterly.
Integrity and Selective Conscientious Objection.Paul Robinson - 2009 - Journal of Military Ethics 8 (1):34-47.
Conscientious Objection by Health Care Professionals.Gry Wester - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (7):427-437.
Selective conscientious objection and Gillette decision.David Malament - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (4):363-386.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-14

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. Carl Ficarrotta
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references