Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement

NanoEthics 6 (3):215-229 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since it is now broadly acknowledged that ethics should receive early consideration in discourse on emerging technologies, ethical debates tend to flourish even while new fields of technology are still in their infancy. Such debates often liberally mix existing applications with technologies in the pipeline and far-reaching visions. This paper analyses the problems associated with this use of ethics as “preparatory” research, taking discourse on human enhancement in general and on pharmaceutical cognitive enhancement in particular as an example. The paper will outline and discuss the gap between the scientific and technological state of the art and the ethical debates, pointing out epistemic problems in this context. Furthermore, it will discuss the future role of genuine ethical reflection in discourse on human enhancement, arguing also that such discourse needs to include a technology assessment—in the broad sense of the term—which encompasses, inter alia, anthropological perspectives and aspects of social theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-10

Downloads
142 (#158,669)

6 months
9 (#509,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

The Case Against Perfection.Michael J. Sandel - 2004 - The Atlantic (April):1–11.
Human Enhancement.Nick Bostrom & Julian Savulescu (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Observing bioethics.Renée C. Fox - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Judith P. Swazey & Judith C. Watkins.

View all 28 references / Add more references