Toward an Anti-Maleficent Research Agenda

Abstract

Important advances in biomedical and behavioral research ethics have occurred over the past few decades, many of them centered on identifying and eliminating significant harms to human subjects of research. Comprehensive attention has not been paid to the totality of harms experienced by animal subjects, although scientific and moral progress require explicit appraisal of these harms. Science is a public good and the prioritizing within, conduct of, generation of, and application of research must soundly address questions about which research is morally defensible and valuable enough to support through funding, publication, tenure, and promotion. Likewise, educational pathways of re-imagined science are critical.

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
46 (#250,558)

6 months
46 (#17,824)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

L. Syd M Johnson
SUNY Upstate Medical University

References found in this work

The Ethical Challenges of Animal Research.Hope R. Ferdowsian & John P. Gluck - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):391-406.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anti-Consumption: An Overview and Research Agenda.M. S. W. Lee, K. V. Fernandez & M. R. Hyman - 2009 - Journal of Business Research 62 (2):145--147.
How to Make the Research Agenda in the Health Sciences Less Distorted.Jan De Winter - 2012 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (1):75-93.
Redefining Disability: Maleficent, Unjust and Inconsistent.B. Cox-White & S. F. Boxall - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (6):558-576.