Authors
Paulo Fernando Tadeu Ferreira
Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Abstract
In view of Alexander of Aphrodisias’s and Porphyry’s respective positions on the issue, I discuss whether logos apophantikos is to be defined, as DI 4 seems to imply, by its being true or false or rather, as DI 5 seems to imply, by its representing the ontological combination/separation of substrate and attribute through the logical combination/separation of subject and predicate.
Keywords Aristotle  De Interpretatione  λόγος ἀποφαντικός  Alexander of Aphrodisias  Porphyry
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v5i1p1-14
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,714
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fatalism and Causal Determinism: An Aristotelian Essay.Michael J. White - 1981 - Philosophical Quarterly 31 (124):231-241.
Ammonius on Future Contingent Propositions.Mario Mignucci - 1999 - In Michael Frede & Gisela Striker (eds.), Rationality in Greek Thought. Clarendon Press. pp. 279-310.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
16 ( #651,637 of 2,462,749 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,182 of 2,462,749 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes