Natality and Tradition: Reading Arendt with Habermas and Gadamer

Arendt Studies 6:119-138 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper situates Hannah Arendt’s concept of natality between the rival concerns of Habermasian critical theory and Gadamerian hermeneutical philosophy. I argue that natality is simultaneously emancipatory and hermeneutically grounded. This is to say that Arendt affirms the possibility of reflectively disrupting precedents set by tradition, even as she refrains from overestimating the emancipatory powers of critical reflection. Through comparison with Habermas and Gadamer, it emerges that Arendt conceives of repetition and revolution as jointly constitutive of human natality. At bottom, natality is not simply an innate capacity for newness, but rather refers to the site of an irreducible confrontation between past and future.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neither Beginning, Nor End - The Anarcho-atelic Event Of Natality.Nathan Van Camp - 2012 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 16:102-115.
Educational Leadership with an Ethics of Plurality and Natality.Iris Berger - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 34 (5):475-487.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-19

Downloads
38 (#408,165)

6 months
20 (#126,042)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Magnus Ferguson
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references