Dissertatio 36:343-364 (2012)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This text analyzes Diogenianus’ testimony (apud Eus., Praep. Ev. VI 8) as a source for Chrysippus’ reply to an objection leveled against Stoic Fate-determinism. I argue that the objection addressed by Chrysippus in the testimony bears relation to the Idle Argument as reported by both Cicero and Origen but, unlike the Idle Argument, deals with the notions of “that which depends on us” (τὸ παρ’ ἡμᾶς), “that which proceeds from us” (τὸ ἐξ ἡμῶν), and the issue of accountability.
|
Keywords | Chrysippus Idle Argument “that which depends on us” (τὸ παρ’ ἡμᾶς) “that which proceeds from us” (τὸ ἐξ ἡμῶν) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.15210/dissertatio.v36i0.8671 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Preconception, Argument, and God.Malcolm Schofield - 1980 - In Malcolm Schofield, Myles Burnyeat & Jonathan Barnes (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 283--308.
El argos logos y su refutación por Crisipo.Ricardo Salles - 2005 - Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 28:239-254.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chrysippus's Response to Diodorus's Master Argument.Harry Ide - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):133-148.
Chrysippus' Dog as a Case Study in Non-Linguistic Cognition.Michael Rescorla - 2009 - In Robert W. Lurz (ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds. Cambridge University Press. pp. 52--71.
Galen and Chrysippus Argument and Refutation in the de Placitis, Books Ii-Iii = Galenus En Chrysippus : Argumentatie En Weerlegging in de de Placitis, Boeken Ii En Iii.Teunis Lambertus Tieleman - 1992 - Department of Philosophy, University of Utrecht.
Chrysippus and the Destruction of Propositions: A Defence of the Standard Interpretation.Michael B. Papazian - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):1-12.
Chrysippus' Modal Logic and Its Relation to Philo and Diodorus.Susanne Bobzien - 1993 - In K. Doering & Th Ebert (eds.), Dialektiker und Stoiker. Franz Steiner. pp. 63--84.
The Chrysippus Intuition and Contextual Theories of Truth.Jay Newhard - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):345-352.
Bodies, Predicates, and Fated Truths: Ontological Distinctions and the Terminology of Causation in Defenses of Stoic Determinism by Chrysippus and Seneca.Jula Wildberger - 2013 - In Francesca Guadelupe Masi & Stefano Maso (eds.), Fate, Chance, Fortune in Ancient Thought. Amsterdam: Hakkert. pp. 103-123.
Chrysippus' Puzzle About Identity.John Bowin - 2003 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24:239-251.
Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the de Placitis Books Ii - Iii.Teun Tieleman - 1996 - Brill.
Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis, Books Ii-Iii.Teun Tieleman (ed.) - 1996 - E.J. Brill.
Chrysippus Josiah B. Gould: The Philosophy of Chrysippus. (Philosophia Antiqua, Xvii.) Pp. Vi+222. Leiden: Brill, 1970. Paper, Fl. 32. [REVIEW]A. A. Long - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (02):214-216.
Chrysippus Confronts the Liar: The Case for Stoic Cassationism.Michael Papazian - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (3):197-214.
The Soul and Personal Identity in Early Stoicism: Two Theories?Aiste Celkyte - 2020 - Apeiron 53 (4):463-486.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-06-29
Total views
4 ( #1,273,485 of 2,498,501 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,501 )
2019-06-29
Total views
4 ( #1,273,485 of 2,498,501 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,501 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads