Law and Philosophy 32 (1):1-1 (2013)

Authors
Kimberly Ferzan
University of Virginia
John Oberdiek
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-012-9167-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Iconoclasts? Who, Us? A Reply to Dolinko.Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):281-287.
Rethinking The Ends of Harm.Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (2-3):177-198.
Response to Critics.Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (4):483-504.
Justification and Excuse.Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2011 - In John Deigh & David Dolinko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Ferzander’s Surrebuttal.Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):463-465.
It Stands to Reason.Rudolf John Harvey - 1960 - New York: J. F. Wagner.
The Structure of Criminal Law.Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2009 - Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (2):223-237.
History: A Very Short Introduction.John Arnold - 2000 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-12-15

Total views
25 ( #457,965 of 2,518,444 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,444 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes