Human Flourishing and Technology Affordances

Philosophy and Technology 37 (1):1-28 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Amid the growing interest in the relationship between technology and human flourishing, philosophical perfectionism can serve as a fruitful lens through which to normatively evaluate technology. This paper offers an analytic framework that explains the relationship between technology and flourishing by way of innate human capacities. According to perfectionism, our human flourishing is determined by how well we exercise our human capacities to know, create, be sociable, use our bodies and exercise the will, by engaging in activities that ultimately produce valuable output. The paper introduces technology affordances to this framework, to show how affordances enable or restrict the exercise of human capacities, thereby impacting levels of human flourishing. One implication of this analysis is that it highlights how technology affordances can cause the privation (absence) of flourishing, by impoverishing capacities. The upshot is that privation may bring about robustly bad unflourishing, especially given that technology and its affordances have the power to degrade the human capacities in the long run. By linking how human capacities are shaped by affordances, we can achieve a better understanding of the ethical implications of technology on human flourishing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Technology's in-betweenness.Luciano Floridi - 2013 - Philosophy and Technology 26 (2):111-115.
The Importance of Wonder in Human Flourishing.Jan B. W. Pedersen - 2020 - Wonder, Education, and Human Flourishing: Theoretical, Emperical and Practical Perspectives.
The Politics of Gender and Technology.Elisabeth K. Kelan - 2009 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 338–341.
Technology’s in-betweeness.Luciano Floridi - 2013 - Philosophy and Technology 26 (2):111–115.
Ethics, Technology, and Posthuman Communities.Steven Benko - 2005 - Essays in Philosophy 6 (1):1-17.
Disability, Technology, and Flourishing.Erik Parens - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (5):inside_front_cover-inside_front_.
Stories of Human Autonomy, Law, and Technology.Kieran Tranter - 2010 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 30 (1):18-21.
Introduction.Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks - 2009 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 1–3.
Trust in the Shell.Andrea Monti - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):507-517.
Daoism, Flourishing, and Gene Editing.Richard Kim - 2019 - In Erik Parens & Josephine Johnston (eds.), Human Flourishing in an Age of Gene Editing. Oxford University Press. pp. 72-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-30

Downloads
42 (#379,962)

6 months
42 (#95,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Avigail Ferdman
Technion, Israel Institute of Technology

References found in this work

Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles.C. Thi Nguyen - 2020 - Episteme 17 (2):141-161.
After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
Value Capture.C. Thi Nguyen - forthcoming - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.
Hostile Epistemology.C. Thi Nguyen - 2023 - Social Philosophy Today 39:9-32.

View all 74 references / Add more references