Journal of Military Ethics 5 (2):93-113 (2006)
AbstractWhen is humanitarian intervention legitimate and how should such interventions be conducted? This article sets out eight liberal principles that underlie humanitarian intervention, some of them abstract principles of international ethics and others more concrete principles that apply specifically to humanitarian intervention. It argues that whilst these principles do not determine the legitimacy of particular interventions, they should ?incline? our judgments towards approval or disapproval. The basic principles include the liberal idea that governments are the mere agents of the people, that tyrannical governments forfeit their legal protections, that human rights entail obligations for governments, that justifiable intervention must intend the end of tyranny or anarchy, that the doctrine of double-effect should be respected, that intervention is only warranted in severe cases, that intervention be welcomed by those it is intended to save, and that ideally it is welcomed by the community of democratic states
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Law of Peoples: With, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work
‘Humane Intervention’: The International Protection of Animal Rights.Alasdair Cochrane & Steve Cooke - 2016 - Journal of Global Ethics 12 (1):106-121.
Forgotten Victims of Military Humanitarian Intervention: A Case for the Principle of Reparation?Shunzo Majima - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (2):203-209.
Global Justice, Sovereignty, and the Problem of Perspective.Jennifer Szende - 2021 - Journal of International Political Theory 17 (1):99-116.
Consequentialism, War, and National Defense.William H. Shaw - 2014 - Journal of International Political Theory 10 (1):20-37.
Similar books and articles
Selective Humanitarian Intervention: Moral Reason and Collective Agents.Jennifer Szende - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):63-76.
The Left and Humanitarian Intervention as Solidarity.Harry van der Linden - 2006 - Radical Philosophy Today 3:111-127.
Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations.Jennifer M. Welsh (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Humanitarian Intervention: Loose Ends.Fernando R. Tesón - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):192-212.
Motives, Outcomes, Intent and the Legitimacy of Humanitarian Intervention.Alex J. Bellamy - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (3):216-232.
Humanitarian Intervention, Altruism, and the Limits of Casuistry.Richard B. Miller - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):3 - 35.
Commonsense Morality and the Consequentialist Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention.Eric A. Heinze - 2005 - Journal of Military Ethics 4 (3):168-182.
Is U.N. Security Council Authorisation for Armed Humanitarian Intervention Morally Necessary?Ned Dobos - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (3):499-515.
Humanitarian Intervention, Consent, and Proportionality.Jeff McMahan - 2009 - In N. Ann Davis, Richard Keshen & Jeff McMahan (eds.), Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover. Oxford University Press.
Humanitarian Military Intervention: Wars for the End of History?Clifford Orwin - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):196-217.
The Principled Case for Employing Private Military and Security Companies in Interventions for Human Rights Purposes.Deane-Peter Baker & James Pattison - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):1-18.
Legitimacy, Humanitarian Intervention, and International Institutions.Miles Kahler - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):20-45.
Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene?James Pattison (ed.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.