Distinguishing interpretive and post-interpretive processes

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):98-99 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A separation between interpretive and post-interpretive processes is central to Caplan & Waters's theory of language comprehension. This commentary raises some issues that are intended to help sharpen the distinction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naturalizing and interpretive turns in epistemology.Kathleen Lennon - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (3):245 – 259.
Good interactions are hard to find.Akira Miyake, Michael J. Emerson & Naomi P. Friedman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):108-109.
Working memory and sentence comprehension: Whose burden of proof?Arthur Wingfield - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):113-114.
Interfaces in memory.Zoltán Bánréti - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):96-96.
Interpretive political science.Mark Bevir (ed.) - 2010 - Los Angeles: SAGE.
Simulation, theory, and emotion.M. Lebar - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (4):423 – 434.
Interpretive reasoning.Laurent Stern - 2005 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Problems with plausibility and alternatives to working memory.Neal J. Pearlmutter - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):109-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#419,193)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references