Philosophical Studies 175 (11):2859-2877 (2018)
AbstractDo states have a right to exclude prospective immigrants as they see fit? According to statists the answer is a qualified yes. For these authors, self-determining political communities have a prima facie right to exclude, which can be overridden by the claims of vulnerable groups such as refugees and children born in the state’s territory. However, there is a concern in the literature that statists have not yet developed a theory that can protect children born in the territory from being excluded from the political community. For if the self-determining political community has the right to decide who should form the self in the first place, then that right should count against both newcomers by immigration and newcomers by birth. Or so the concern goes. In this essay, I defend statism against this line of criticism and provide a liberal justification for the inclusion of children born within the state’s borders. My account leads to some surprising implication for citizenship law, as well as immigration arrangements in the area of asylum and unauthorized immigration.
Similar books and articles
Children and the Limits of Paternalism.Brian Carey - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (3):581-595.
Membership and Morality: Admission to Citizenship in Liberal Democratic States.Joseph H. Carens - 1989 - In William Rogers Brubaker (ed.), Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in Europe and North America. University press of America. pp. 31-49.
Selling Citizenship: A Defence.Javier Hidalgo - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (3):223-239.
Autonomy and Settling: Rehabilitating the Relationship between Autonomy and Paternalism.Rosa Terlazzo - 2015 - Utilitas 27 (3):303-325.
Expansive Citizenship: Voting beyond Territory and Membership.Rainer Bauböck - 2005 - PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (4):683-687.
Can Withdrawing Citizenship be Justified?Christian Barry & Luara Ferracioli - 2016 - Political Studies 64:1055-1070.
The well-being of children, the limits of paternalism, and the state: can disparate interests be reconciled?Michael S. Merry - 2007 - Ethics and Education 2 (1):39-59.
Community of Philosophical Inquiry: citizenship in Scottish classrooms. 'You need to think like you've never thinked before.'.Claire Cassidy & Donald Christie - 2014 - Childhood and Philosophy 10 (19):33-54.
Justice, education and the politics of childhood: challenges and perspectives.Johannes Drerup, Gunter Graf, Christoph Schickhardt & Gottfried Schweiger (eds.) - 2016 - Springer.
Illegal: White Supremacy and Immigration Status.Jose Jorge Mendoza - 2016 - In Alex Sager (ed.), The Ethics and Politics of Immigration: Core Issues and Emerging Trends. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 201-220.
Children, Paternalism and the Development of Autonomy.Amy Mullin - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):413-426.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Territorial Exclusion: An Argument against Closed Borders.Daniel Weltman - 2021 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 19 (3):257-90.
Illiberal Immigrants and Liberalism's Commitment to its Own Demise.Daniel Weltman - 2020 - Public Affairs Quarterly 34 (3):271-297.
The rights and duties of immigrants in liberal societies.Peter W. Higgins - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (11):e12527.
Migrants by plane and migrants by stork: can we refuse citizenship to one, but not the other?Tim Meijers - 2022 - Ethics and Global Politics 15 (3):69-90.
References found in this work
Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration.David Miller - 2016 - Harvard University Press.
Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality.Michael Walzer - 1983 - Basic Books.