Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system?
Visual Cognition 7 (1):323-344 (2000)
AbstractEvidence from many different paradigms (e.g. change blindness, inattentional blindness, transsaccadic integration) indicate that observers are often very poor at reporting changes to their visual environment. Such evidence has been used to suggest that the spatio-temporal coherence needed to represent change can only occur in the presence of focused attention. In four experiments we use modified change blindness tasks to demonstrate (a) that sensitivity to change does occur in the absence of awareness, and (b) this sensitivity does not rely on the redeploy- ment of attention. We discuss these results in relation to theories of scene percep- tion, and propose a reinterpretatio n of the role of attention in representing change.
Similar books and articles
Change blindness and priming: When it does and does not occur.Michael E. Silverman & Arien Mack - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2):409-422.
An ERP study of change detection, change blindness, and visual awareness.Mika Koivisto & Antti Revonsuo - 2003 - Psychophysiology 40 (3):423-429.
Representation of change: Separate electrophysiological markers of attention, awareness, and implicit processing.Diego Fernandez-Duque, Giordana Grossi, Ian Thornton & Helen Neville - 2003 - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 (4):491-507.
Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness.Daniel J. Simons, Christopher Chabris & Tatiana Schnur - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (1):78-97.
False predictions about the detectability of visual changes: The role of beliefs about attention, memory, and the continuity of attended objects in causing change blindness blindness.Daniel T. Levin, Sarah B. Drivdahl, Nausheen Momen & Melissa R. Beck - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):507-527.
Time course of brain activity during change blindness and change awareness: Performance is predicted by neural events before change onset.Gilles Pourtois, Michael De Pretto, Claude-Alain Hauert & Patrik Vuilleumier - 2006 - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (12):2108-2129.
Change blindness and time to consciousness.Michael Niedeggen, Petra Wichmann & Petra Stoerig - 2001 - European Journal of Neuroscience 14 (10):1719-1726.
Psychophysical strategies for rendering the normally visible invisible.Randolph Blake & Chai-Youn Kim - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (8):381-388.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Change blindness: Past, present, and future. [REVIEW]Daniel J. Simons & Ronald A. Rensink - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):16-20.
Change Blindness.Ronald A. Rensink - 2005 - In Laurent Itti, Geraint Rees & John K. Tsotsos (eds.), Neurobiology of Attention. Academic Press. pp. 76--81.
Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects.Jon Driver, Greg Davis, Charlotte Russell, Massimo Turatto & Elliot Freeman - 2001 - Cognition 80 (1-2):61-95.
References found in this work
On a confusion about a function of consciousness.Ned Block - 1995 - Brain and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2):227-–247.
To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Ronald A. Rensink, J. Kevin O'Regan & James J. Clark - 1997 - Psychological Science 8:368-373.
Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Melvyn A. Goodale & A. David Milner - 1992 - Trends in Neurosciences 15:20-25.