The relation of monologion and proslogion

Heythrop Journal 46 (2):149–166 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that Monologion and Proslogion though distinguishable are not really separable. They are distinct as "the way in" and "the way when one is in" but "the way in" reveals itself as a discovery of already being in; thus these ways are distinct in act, but not in being. Monologion moves from imaginary ignorance to real reverence, while Proslogion begins within reverence to achieve understanding.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm of Canterbury.Jasper Hopkins & Herbert Richardson - 1900 - New York: Edwin Mellen Press. Edited by Jasper Hopkins & Herbert Warren Richardson.
Anselm.Sandra Visser & Thomas Williams - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas Williams.
The non-Christian influence on Anselm’s Proslogion argument.Nancy Kendrick - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):73-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
124 (#142,352)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gene Fendt
University of Nebraska at Kearney

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references