Reason, Feeling, and Happiness: Bridging an Ancient/Modern Divide in The Plague
Philosophy and Literature 43 (2):350-368 (2019)
Abstract
Camus is defined by many as an absurdist philosopher of revolt. The Plague, however, shows him working rigorously through a well-known division between ancient and modern ethics concerning the relation of reason, feeling and happiness. For Aristotle, the virtues are stable dispositions including affective and intellectual elements. For Kant, one’s particular feelings are either that from which we must abstract to judge moral worth, or are a constant hindrance to proper moral activity. Further, Kant claims “habit belongs to the physical nature of the determination of the will,” which seems to imply habit cannot be a moral determination at all. A related disagreement regards virtue and happiness. Aristotle’s happiness is “an activity of the soul in accord with virtue.” For Kant and other moderns, happiness is an ideal of imagination, “a maximum of well-being in my present, and in every future, state,” all the elements of which “are without exception empirical.” Thus happiness seems more the constant counterweight to moral action than its fulfillment. Kant and Aristotle agree, however, in their judgment of many characters and actions, as is illustrated in The Plague. The novel provides realistic insights into a philosophical agreement between these supposed oppositions. In particular, I show how both philosophers would agree in their judgements concerning both the relative goodness and relative happiness of Joseph Grand and Raymond Rambert. The illustration of this agreement proves Camus is valorizing a traditional ethic.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1353/phl.2019.0024
My notes
Similar books and articles
Kant’s Moderate Cynicism and the Harmony between Virtue and Worldly Happiness.David Forman - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (1):75-109.
The Relationship between Virtue and Happiness in Aristotle and Ghazali’s Views.Majid Mulla Yusefi & Umme Leyla Shirkhani - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 15 (57):25-42.
On the Relationship between Happiness and Virtue in Nicomachean Ethics.Yung Zhang - 2003 - Philosophy and Culture 30 (8):39-58.
An Interpretation of Aristotle's Notion of Happiness in the "Nicomachean Ethics".Mark Alan Stone - 1982 - Dissertation, Vanderbilt University
Individual and Collective Flourishing in Kant's Philosophy.Lara Denis - 2008 - Kantian Review 13 (1):82-115.
Happiness Proportioned to Virtue: Kant and the Highest Good.Eoin O'Connell - 2012 - Kantian Review 17 (2):257-279.
Happiness, Eudaimonia, and The Principle of Descriptive Adequacy.Matthew Cashen - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (5):619-635.
The Psychology of Happiness: A Good Human Life.Samuel S. Franklin - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Intrinsically Valued Parts of Happiness.Nicholas White - 1999 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 2:149.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-10-29
Downloads
51 (#232,654)
6 months
7 (#117,875)
2019-10-29
Downloads
51 (#232,654)
6 months
7 (#117,875)
Historical graph of downloads