D. Reidel Publishing Company (1986)

Abstract
Several years ago I came across a marvelous little paper in which Hector-Neri Castaneda shows that standard versions of act utilitarian l ism are formally incoherent. I was intrigued by his argument. It had long seemed to me that I had a firm grasp on act utilitarianism. Indeed, it had often seemed to me that it was the clearest and most attractive of normative theories. Yet here was a simple and relatively uncontrover sial argument that showed, with only some trivial assumptions, that the doctrine is virtually unintelligible. The gist of Castaneda's argument is this: suppose we understand act utilitarianism to be the view that an act is obligatory if and only if its utility exceeds that of each alternative. Suppose it is obligatory for a certain person to perform an act with two parts - we can call it 'A & B'. Then, obviously enough, it is also obligatory for this person to perform the parts, A and B. If act utilitarianism were true, we appar ently could infer that the utility of A & B is higher than that of A, and higher than that of B (because A & B is obligatory, and the other acts are alternatives to A & B).
Keywords Deontic logic   Duty   Ethics   Social ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2011
Buy this book $48.73 used (71% off)   $135.43 new (20% off)   $169.99 from Amazon    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9401085315   9027721645   9027721645   9789027721648   9789401085311
DOI 10.2307/2107839
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Deontic Logic.Paul McNamara - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Meaning in the Lives of Humans and Other Animals.Duncan Purves & Nicolas Delon - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (2):317-338.

View all 61 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques From Informal Logic.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4108:208--221.
Situationist Deontic Logic.Sven Ove Hansson - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):423-448.
Some Main Problems of Deontic Logic.Jaakko Hintikka - 1971 - In Risto Hilpinen (ed.), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Sold and Distributed in the U.S.A. And Canada by Kluwer Boston. pp. 59-104.
On Deontic Logic.Leon Gumański - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (1):63 - 75.
Agency and Deontic Logic.John F. Horty - 2001 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Mally's Deontic Logic.G.-J. C. Lokhorst & L. Goble - 2004 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):37-57.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-08-01

Total views
83 ( #141,776 of 2,520,891 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,607 of 2,520,891 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes