The OIC/PAP Dispute: Two Ways of Interpreting the '€˜Ought' Implies '€˜Can'€™

In Sofia Bonicalzi, Leonardo Caffo & Mattia Sorgon (eds.), Naturalism and Constructivism in Metaethics. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 172--181 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legitimacy and the virtualization of dispute resolution.Laurens Mommers - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):207-232.
Interpreting people and interpreting texts.William Child - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):423 – 441.
Reasons and Abilities: Some Preliminaries.John Gardner - 2013 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 58 (1):63-74.
Does Kant Hold that Ought Implies Can?Shyam Ranganathan - 2010 - In J. Sharma & A. Raguramaraju (eds.), Grounding Morality. Routledge. pp. 60-87.
The Ways of Interpreting Dao. [REVIEW]Ruiqi Ma - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (3):487 - 492.
A Puzzle About Disputes and Disagreements.Hans Rott - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (1):167–189.
Review: The Ways of Interpreting Dao. [REVIEW]Ruiqi Ma - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (3):487 - 492.
Four Dimensionalism.Theodore Sider - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-18

Downloads
65 (#241,326)

6 months
4 (#724,033)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guglielmo Feis
Università degli Studi di Milano

Citations of this work

‘Ought implies Can’ and the law.Chris Fox & Guglielmo Feis - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):370-393.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references