Filozofija I Društvo 31 (3):406-419 (2020)

Authors
Guglielmo Feis
Università degli Studi di Milano
Abstract
The paper distinguishes two accounts of legal normativity. One-source accounts claim there is only one source for legal normativity, which is ultimately linguistic. Two-source accounts claim legal normativity is both linguistic and non-linguistic. Two-source accounts claim we need to go beyond language and beyond propositions taken as linguistic entities, while they are one-source accounts? main conceptual tool. Both accounts construct propositions as linguistic. There is, nevertheless, a documented analytic tradition starting with G.E. Moore that constructs propositions as non-linguistic entities. Today, the problem of the unity of proposition and structured propositions are highly debated in metaphysics. How does such debates fit into the one-source vs. two-source picture of legal normativity? Why has analytic legal philosophy failed to consider such an option concerning propositions? This paper thus reconstructs the argumentative dynamics between one-source and two-source accounts; presents the less considered philosophical view of propositions as non-linguistic entities and discusses how to include or dismiss such a philosophical view in the one-source/two-source debate on legal normativity. nema
Keywords Non-linguistic propositions, legal normativity, nonlinguistic normativity, normative propositions
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2298/fid2003406f
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
The Unity of the Proposition.Richard Gaskin - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
The Nature of Judgment.G. E. Moore - 1899 - Mind 8 (2):176-193.
Structured Propositions.Jeffrey C. King - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On Drawing Lines on a Map.Barry Smith - 1995 - In A. U. Frank, W. Kuhn & D. M. Mark (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Proceedings of COSIT '95. New York: Springer. pp. 475-484.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Contingently Existing Propositions.Michael Nelson - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (5):776-803.
Propositions, Attitudinal Objects, and the Distinction Between Actions and Products.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume on Propositions, Edited by G. Rattan and D. Hunter 43 (5-6):679-701.
On Fineness of Grain.Jeffrey C. King - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781.
Attitudinal Objects.Friederike Moltmann - forthcoming - In Chris Tillman (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Propositions. Routledge.
Propositions on the Cheap.Alex Grzankowski & Ray Buchanan - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (12):3159-3178.
Self-Referential Propositions.Bruno Whittle - 2017 - Synthese 194 (12):5023-5037.
Wittgenstein on Nonsignificant Propositions.Puqun Li - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Ottawa (Canada)
Propositions as Interpreted Abstracta.Thomas Hodgson - forthcoming - In Chris Tillman & Adam R. Murray (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Propositions. Routledge.
Meaning and Verifiability.W. H. F. Barnes - 1939 - Philosophy 14 (56):410 - 421.
A Theory of Propositions.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2016 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 25 (1):83-125.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-09-29

Total views
8 ( #1,002,747 of 2,498,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes