Discussion

Philosophy of Science 1 (4):484-486 (1934)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031824800018754

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Functionalism, psychological theory, and the uniting sciences: some discussion remarks.Herbert Feigl - 1955 - Psychological Review 62 (3):232-235.
Tools for Improving Student Discussion or Helping Students and Teachers Create a Community of Inquiry.Richard Morehouse - 1987 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 8 (2).
Mind, Matter, and Method. [REVIEW]A. R. E. - 1967 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (3):556-556.
Science and semantic realism.Ernest Nagel - 1950 - Philosophy of Science 17 (2):174-181.
The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions.M. A. van Rees - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):457-470.
Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research.David B. Resnik - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):617-630.
Argumentative Bluff in Eristic Discussion: An Analysis and Evaluation.Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):383-398.
Pragma-Dialectic’s Necessary Conditions for a Critical Discussion.Frank Zenker - unknown
La conoscibilità e i suoi limiti.Davide Fassio - unknown
Discussion structures as tools for public deliberation.E. Popa, Vincent Blok & R. Wesselink - 2020 - Public Understanding of Science 1 (29):76-93.
Mind, matter, and method.Paul K. Feyerabend, Herbert Feigl & Grover Maxwell - 1966 - Minneapolis,: University of Minnesota Press. Edited by Herbert Feigl & Grover Maxwell.
Reexamining the “Discussion” in the Moral Dilemma Discussion.Rommel O. Salvador - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 156 (1):241-256.
Disentangling defining and demonstrating: Notes on an. post. II 3-7.Laura M. Castelli - 2019 - Manuscrito 42 (4):243-281.
Inquiries and Provocations: Selected Writings 1929–1974.Herbert Feigl - 1980 - Springer Verlag.
The forgotten problem: Aims in science.John Somerville - 1935 - Philosophy of Science 2 (2):246-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The American Reception of Logical Positivism: First Encounters, 1929–1932.Sander Verhaegh - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (10):106-142.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references