Kreativität im Denken. Eine Kritik des Reliabilitätsarguments von John D. Norton gegen rationalistische Epistemologien zur Methode des Gedankenexperiments

In Günter Abel (ed.), Kreativität. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that Norton's case against Brown's rationalism about thought experiments suffers from serious shortcomings, which relate to the nature of induction.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Thought Experiments and the Inference to a Coherent Explanation.Ulrich J. Kuehne - unknown
Gedankenexperiment und erklärung / thought experiment and scientific explanation.Ulrich J. Kuehne - unknown
Gedankenexperiment und Erklärung.Ulrich J. Kühne - unknown
Intuitions in Science: Thought Experiments as Argument Pumps.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2014 - In Anthony R. Booth & Darrell P. Rowbottom (eds.), Intuitions. Oxford University Press. pp. 119-134.
Reconstruction, Justification and Incompatibility in Norton’s Account of Thought Experiments.Boris Grozdanoff - 2007 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):69-79.
Induction and inference to the best explanation.Ruth Weintraub - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):203-216.
Eino Mikkola: (i) Die Abstraktion, Begriff und Struktur: eine logischsemantische Untersuchung auf nominalistischer Grundlage unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Lateinischen; (ii) Die Konzessivität des Altlateins im Bereich des Satzganzen: eine syntaktisch-stilistisch-semantische Untersuchung. (Sprache und Denken: Finnische Beiträge zur Philosophic und Sprachwissenschaft, vols. i and ii.) Pp. 499, 247. Helsinki: Suomalainen Kirjakauppa, 1964. Paper. DM. 32.50, 19–5O. [REVIEW]Betty I. Knott - 1969 - The Classical Review 19 (03):382-.
Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism.John D. Norton - 2002 - In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell. pp. 44-66.
Do Thought Experiments Have a Life of Their Own? Comments on James Brown, Nancy Nersessian and David Gooding.Ian Hacking - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:302 - 308.
"Experiments of Pure Reason": Kantianism and Thought Experiments in Science.Yiftach J. H. Fehige - 2012 - Epistemologia 35 (1):141-160.
A material theory of induction.John D. Norton - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
Zur Kritik des Johannes von Antiocha, by Georgios Sotiriadis. Leipzig, 1887. 3 Mk. 20.John B. Bury - 1888 - The Classical Review 2 (07):208-209.
On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument?John D. Norton - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1139-1151.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yiftach J. H. Fehige
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references