Authors
Yiftach J. H. Fehige
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Abstract
In this paper I argue that Daniel A. Dombrowski's defence of a version of Anselm's ontological argument fails.
Keywords Anselm  Ontological Argument  Thought Experiment
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-11-05

Total views
152 ( #76,983 of 2,507,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes