Effects of amount of reinforcement and of pre- and postreinforcement delays on learning and extinction

Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (3):167 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0045052

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction.Allan R. Wagner - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (3):234.
Extinction as a function of the spacing of extinction trials.Walter C. Stanley - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):249.
Effect of absolute amount, mean amount, and pattern of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction.George C. Jernstedt - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (3p1):407.
Resistance to extinction as a function of the amount of reinforcement present during acquisition.Bradley Reynolds - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):46.
Amount and percentage of reinforcement and duration of goal confinement in conditioning and extinction.Stewart H. Hulse Jr - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (1):48.
The effect of different amounts of reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of a simple running response.F. A. Mote - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (3):216.
Extinction after partial reinforcement and minimal learning as a test of both verbal control and pre in concept learning.Daniel C. O'connell & Margaret V. Wagner - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1):151.
Within-subject partial reinforcement effects: Differential extinction following nondifferential percentage of reinforcement in acquisition.Dennis G. Dyck, Roger L. Mellgren & Jeffrey A. Seybert - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):391.
A positive relationship between reinforcement and resistance to extinction produced by removing a source of confusion from a technique that had produced opposite results.Douglas H. Lawrence & Neal E. Miller - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (6):494.
Learning without awareness and extinction following awareness as a function of reinforcement.Jerry Hirsch - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (3):218.
Positive and negative partial-reinforcement extinction effects carried through continuous reinforcement, changed motivation, and changed response.Robert R. Ross - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):492.
Choice between magnitude and percentage or reinforcement.Norman E. Spear - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (1):44.
Response latency as a function of the amount of reinforcement.David Zeaman - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (4):466.
The effect of intermittent reinforcement on the change in extinction rate following successive reconditionings.Charles C. Perkins Jr & Anthony J. Cacioppo - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):794.
Extinction as a function of the order of partial and consistent reinforcement.N. S. Sutherland, N. J. Mackintosh & J. B. Wolfe - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1):56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
7 (#1,360,984)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references