Mathematical intuition vs. mathematical monsters

Synthese 125 (3):317-332 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Geometrical and physical intuition, both untutored andcultivated, is ubiquitous in the research, teaching,and development of mathematics. A number ofmathematical ``monsters'', or pathological objects, havebeen produced which – according to somemathematicians – seriously challenge the reliability ofintuition. We examine several famous geometrical,topological and set-theoretical examples of suchmonsters in order to see to what extent, if at all,intuition is undermined in its everyday roles.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
336 (#57,121)

6 months
16 (#138,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Perceiving Necessity.Catherine Legg & James Franklin - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (3).
Awareness of Abstract Objects.Elijah Chudnoff - 2012 - Noûs 47 (4):706-726.
Is Intuition Based On Understanding?[I thank Jo].Elijah Chudnoff - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (1):42-67.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The iterative conception of set.George Boolos - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (8):215-231.
Proofs and refutations (IV).I. Lakatos - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (56):296-342.
In the Light of Logic.Solomon Feferman - 1998 - New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mathematics, Form and Function.Saunders MacLane - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):33-37.

View all 14 references / Add more references