What I Said and What I Should Have Said

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):163-178 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this reply I address problems identified by my critics in my concept of formal bias, my use of phenomenology, the relation between my work and McLuhan’s media theory, and the relation of science to technology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Transforming technology: a critical theory revisited.Andrew Feenberg - 2002 - New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Andrew Feenberg.
Critical theory of technology.Andrew Feenberg - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks.
Formal Bias and Normative Critique of Technology Design.Graeme Kirkpatrick - 2013 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):25-46.
The Role of Experience in the Critical Theory of Technology.Roy Bendor - 2013 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):47-71.
Interview with Andrew Feenberg.Laureano Ralon - 2010 - Figure/Ground Interview Series.
Critical philosophy of technology: The basic issues.Hans Radder - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (1):51 – 70.
Andrew Feenberg, Critical theory of technology.A. J. Cohen - 1994 - Theory and Society 23:575-575.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-04

Downloads
65 (#225,534)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Feenberg
Simon Fraser University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references