Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):45 – 70 (1996)
AbstractThe debate between Marcuse and Habermas over technology marked a significant turning point in the history of the Frankfurt School. After the 1960s Habermas's influence grew as Marcuse's declined and Critical Theory adopted a far less Utopian stance. Recently there has been a revival of quite radical technology criticism in the environmental movement and under the influence of Foucault and constructivism. This article takes a new look at the earlier debate from the standpoint of these recent developments. While much of Habermas's argument remains persuasive, his defense of modernity now seems to concede far too much to the claims of autonomous technology. His essentialist picture of technology as an application of a purely instrumental form of nonsocial rationality is less plausible after a decade of historicizing research in technology studies. The article argues that Marcuse was right after all to claim that technology is socially determined even if he was unable to develop his insight fruitfully. The article derives a new approach to technology criticism from both constructivism and Habermas's communication theory. The essence of technology is shown to be historical and reflexive, like the essence of other social institutions. As such an institution, its rationality is always implemented in value?biased forms subject to political critique
Similar books and articles
Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited.Andrew Feenberg - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Marcuse, Habermas, and the Critique of Technology.Samir Gandesha - 2004 - In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge.
Radical Philosophy of Technology.Andrew Feenberg - 2009 - Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1-2):199-217.
Habermas, Marcuse and the Aufhebung of Science and Technology.Norman Stockman - 1978 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (1):15-35.
Heidegger and Marcuse : The Catastrophe and Redemption of Technology.Andrew Feenberg - 2004 - In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge.
Socially Constructed Technology.David J. Stump - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):217 – 224.
From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg.Iain Thomson - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):203 – 215.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Technological Capital: Bourdieu, Postphenomenology, and the Philosophy of Technology Beyond the Empirical Turn.Alberto Romele - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (3):483-505.
Steering Representations—Towards a Critical Understanding of Digital Twins.Paulan Korenhof, Vincent Blok & Sanneke Kloppenburg - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1751-1773.
Critical Theory and the Question of Technology: The Frankfurt School Revisited.Gerard Delanty & Neal Harris - 2021 - Thesis Eleven 166 (1):88-108.
From Human-Centred to Human-Context Centred Approach: Looking Back Over 'the Hills', What has Been Gained and Lost? [REVIEW]Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (4):471-495.
Possibilities of Democratisation in Organisations.Han van Diest - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (1):97 – 117.
References found in this work
One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society.Herbert Marcuse - 1964 - Routledge.
The Technological Society. Translated From the French by John Wilkinson. With an Introd. By Robert K. Merton.Jacques Ellul (ed.) - 1964 - New York: Knopf.
The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution.Carolyn Merchant - 1980 - Harpercollins.