AIDS: The Making of a Chronic Disease

Univ of California Press (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Finally, several contributors provide a sampling of international perspectives on the impact of AIDS in other nations. When AIDS was first recognized in 1981, most experts believed that it was a plague, a virulent unexpected disease. They thought AIDS, as a plague, would resemble the great epidemics of the past; it would be devastating but would soon subside, perhaps never to return. The media as well as many policy makers accepted this historical analogy. Much of the response to AIDS in the United States and abroad during the first five years of the epidemic assumed that it could be addressed by severe emergency measures that would reassure a frightened population while signaling social concern for the sufferers and those at risk of contracting the disease. By the middle 1980s, however, it became increasingly clear that AIDS was a chronic infection, not a classic plague.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
2 (#1,780,599)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The shock of the new: A psycho-dynamic extension of social representational theory.Hélène Joffe - 1996 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 26 (2):197–219.
Multiculturalism as Disease: Advocating AIDS.Jody Norton - 1998 - Journal of Medical Humanities 19 (2/3):99-125.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references