Intuition versus Reason: Strategies People Use to Think About Moral Problems

Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We asked college students to make judgments about realistic moral situations presented as dilemmas (which asked for an either/or decision) vs. problems (which did not ask for such a decision) as well as when the situation explicitly included affectively salient language vs. non-affectively salient language. We report two main findings. The first is that there are four different types of cognitive strategy that subjects use in their responses: simple reasoning, intuitive judging, cautious reasoning, and empathic reasoning. We give operational definitions of these types in terms of our observed data. In addition, the four types characterized strategies not only in the whole sample, but also in all of the subsamples in our study. The second finding is that the intuitive judging type comprised approximately 26% of our respondents, while about 74% of our respondents employed one of the three styles of reasoning named above. We think that these findings present an interesting challenge to models of moral cognition which predict that there is either a single, or a single most common, strategy – especially a strategy of relying upon one’s intuitions – that people use to think about moral situations.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral intuitions, moral expertise and moral reasoning.Albert W. Musschenga - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):597-613.
Moral reasoning.Gilbert Harman, Kelby Mason & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2010 - In John M. Doris (ed.), Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Moral Reasoning: Hints and Allegations.Joseph M. Paxton & Joshua D. Greene - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):511-527.
What is Moral Reasoning?Leland F. Saunders - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (1):1-20.
What good is moral reasoning?Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Mind and Society 10 (2):131-148.
Studying Moral Reasoning in Business Settings.Elaine McGivern & James Weber - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:18-23.
Invisible fences of the moral domain.Jonathan Haidt - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):552-553.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-01

Downloads
692 (#24,145)

6 months
68 (#70,861)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Fedyk
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations