Attention Is Amplification, Not Selection
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (1):299-324 (2021)
Abstract
We argue that recent empirical findings and theoretical models shed new light on the nature of attention. According to the resulting amplification view, attentional phenomena can be unified at the neural level as the consequence of the amplification of certain input signals of attention-independent perceptual computations. This way of identifying the core realizer of attention evades standard criticisms often raised against sub-personal accounts of attention. Moreover, this approach also reframes our thinking about the function of attention by shifting the focus from the function of selection to the function of amplification.Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
Meditative Attention to Bodily Sensations: Conscious Attention without Selection?Kranti Saran - 2018 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 25 (5-6):156-178.
Target selection, attention, and the superior colliculus.Richard J. Krauzlis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):98-99.
Aesthetic Attention: A Proposal to Pay It More Attention.Kathrine Cuccuru - 2018 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 55 (2):155-179.
Grounding attention in action control: The intentional control of selection.Bernhard Hommel - 2010 - In Brian Bruya (ed.), Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in the Cognitive Science of Attention and Action. MIT Press. pp. 121--140.
Attention, Videogames and the Retentional Economies of Affective Amplification.James Ash - 2012 - Theory, Culture and Society 29 (6):3-26.
The role of signal detection and amplification in the induction of emotion by music.William Forde Thompson & Max Coltheart - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):597-598.
Interdependence of attention and consciousness.N. Srinivasan - 2008 - In Rahul Banerjee & B. K. Chakrabarti (eds.), Models of Brain and Mind: Physical, Computational, and Psychological Approaches. Elsevier. pp. 65-75.
Is there more to visual attention than meets the eye?Cyril Latimer - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):690-691.
Biological function, selection, and reduction.Richard N. Manning - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):69-82.
On the evolution of conscious attention.Harry Haroutioun Haladjian & Carlos Montemayor - 2015 - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22 (3):595-613.
Joint attention and common knowledge.John Campbell - 2005 - In Naomi Eilan, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 287--297.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-10-01
Downloads
179 (#72,043)
6 months
30 (#41,778)
2018-10-01
Downloads
179 (#72,043)
6 months
30 (#41,778)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Fuzziness in the Mind: Can Perception be Unconscious?Henry Taylor - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (2):383-398.
Attenuating oneself.Jakub Limanowski & Karl Friston - 2020 - Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 1 (I):1-16.
Range content, attention, and the precision of representation.Trey Boone - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (8):1141-1161.
Attention: a descriptive taxonomy.Antonios Kaldas - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (4):1-27.
References found in this work
Neurophilosophy: Toward A Unified Science of the Mind-Brain.Patricia Smith Churchland - 1986 - MIT Press.
Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.