Dieu trompeur, mauvais génie et origine de l'erreur selon Descartes et Suarez

Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 191 (1):61 - 72 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jusqu'à quel point Descartes emprunte-t-il à Suarez les notions de « dieu trompeur » et de « mauvais génie » ? En fait, bien qu'elles aient leur source dans la scolastique en général (et pas seulement chez Suarez), l'originalité de Descartes est de les avoir utilisées dans le cadre d'une recherche du fondement de la science. L'auteur de cet article y discute les opinions d'Emanuela Scribano. The question at stake is to know up to what point Descartes borrows the concepts of a deceitful God and an evil genius from Suarez. In fact, though the latter concepts may find their origins in scolastics as such (and not only in Suarez), Descartes' originality rests in having used them within the framework of a research of the foundations of science. The author of the present paper hebery studies and discusses Emanuela Scribano's opinions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Descartes' Conception of the Soul Orthodox ?Zbigniew Janowski - forthcoming - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale.
The Philosophy of Francisco Surez.Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.) - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Suárez on continuous quantity.Jorge Secada - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.
Arnauld on Descartes' Essence: a Misunderstanding.Robert A. Imlay - 1979 - Studia Leibnitiana 11 (1):134 - 145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references