The moral obligations of trust

Philosophical Explorations 17 (3):332-345 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral obligation, Darwall argues, is irreducibly second personal. So too, McMyler argues, is the reason for belief supplied by testimony and which supports trust. In this paper, I follow Darwall in arguing that the testimony is not second personal ?all the way down?. However, I go on to argue, this shows that trust is not fully second personal, which in turn shows that moral obligation is equally not second personal ?all the way down?

Similar books and articles

Moral Testimony.Alison Hills - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):552-559.
Govier on Trust.Robert C. Pinto - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (2):263-291.
Trust, staking, and expectations.Philip J. Nickel - 2009 - Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (3):345–362.
Knowledge on Trust.Paul Faulkner - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Moral testimony and its authority.Philip Nickel - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):253-266.
Knowledge on Affective Trust.Arnon Keren - 2012 - Abstracta 6 (S6):33-46.
Moral obligation: Form and substance.Stephen Darwall - 2010 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1pt1):31-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-29

Downloads
436 (#43,083)

6 months
82 (#51,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Faulkner
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

Epistemology Personalized.Matthew A. Benton - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (269):813-834.
Trust as performance.J. Adam Carter - 2022 - Philosophical Issues 32 (1):120-147.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Testimony: a philosophical study.C. A. J. Coady - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge on Trust.Paul Faulkner - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Testimony, Trust, and Authority.Benjamin McMyler - 2011 - , US: Oxford University Press.

View all 23 references / Add more references