Commentary on Uses of arguments from definition in children’s argumentation

Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference 11 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the reasoning of two 5-year old children’s use of argument from definition. The author uses the Argumentum Model of Topics to accomplish this task. A brief history of the “locus of definition” is presented, as well as a description of how and where the data were collected. More specifically, the data come from a study of students conducted for over 30 years in Switzerland. Two examples are discussed where an adult experimenter examined these children’s responses to conservation of liquid and number tasks. The two examples of children’s responses were analyzed using the locus from definition. Results show that children are capable of providing responses indicating their beliefs and support for them that are beyond Piaget’s description of a preoperational child’s reasoning abilities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Buridan on the Possibility of Defining Definition.Rodrigo Guerizoli - 2017 - History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (3):201-209.
Philosophy for Children: Why do we need it?Judy Satterwhite - 1982 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 3 (1).
Can children do philosophy?Karin Murris - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 34 (2):261–279.
Can Children Do Philosophy?Karin Murris - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 34 (2):261-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-02

Downloads
9 (#1,214,023)

6 months
1 (#1,520,257)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references